Photo: extreme-tennis.eu

Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026

Name: Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026
Brand: Oxdog

Oxdog · 2026 · Hyper

Teardrop

Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026 pairs a low swingweight that feels light and easy to whip around and a teardrop head that splits the difference between power and control.

No price yet

Measurements

The headline figures used in the comparison, with where each sits across the indexed rackets.

Swingweight

164.5

Higher than 47% of rackets

Twistweight

18.7

Higher than 63% of rackets

Balance (cm)

26.3

Higher than 38% of rackets

Face stiffness

Higher than 79% of rackets

Frame stiffness

Higher than 22% of rackets

Foam & trampoline

EVA Medium · Low-medium

HES Carbon

Measurements by source

Every reading is kept with its source and confidence. Conflicting readings are listed side by side rather than averaged.

Source	Confidence	SW	TW	Bal	Scr	RA
LabExtreme Tennis X-Compareshape Teardrop · face HES Carbon · foam EVA Medium	High	164.5	18.7	26.3	66	85
ImageProduct image (silhouette inspection)shape Teardrop	High

Values are shown in each source's native scale (X-Compare, official or TWU). A blank cell means that source did not report that metric.

Closest alternatives

The rackets most similar to this one, using it as the reference.

Dunlop Galactica Pro LS
Close on swingweight, balance and face stiffness, the same head shape and similar foam.
Very close100
NOX NextGen Pro Hybrid 3K 2025
Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.
Very close100
Tecnifibre Curva Power
Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.
Very close99
Pro Kennex Kinetic Legend Pro
Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.
Very close98
NOX Carbon Quantum 12K
Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.
Very close98
Black Crown Special Max
Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.
Very close97

Data & method

Measurements are third-party readings retained with provenance, and the score is a heuristic comparison, not an authoritative ranking. See the Method and Sources.