NOX NextGen Pro Hybrid 3K 2025

Photo: extreme-tennis.eu

NOX NextGen Pro Hybrid 3K 2025

NOX · 2025 · NextGen

Hybrid round/teardrop (borderline shape classification)

NOX NextGen Pro Hybrid 3K 2025 pairs a low swingweight that feels light and easy to whip around.

No price yet

Measurements

The headline figures used in the comparison, with where each sits across the indexed rackets.

Swingweight
166
Higher than 55% of rackets
Twistweight
18.2
Higher than 44% of rackets
Balance (cm)
26.5
Higher than 51% of rackets
Face stiffness
65
Higher than 68% of rackets
Frame stiffness
85
Higher than 22% of rackets
Foam & trampoline
EVA Medium · Low-medium
Carbon 3K

Measurements by source

Every reading is kept with its source and confidence. Conflicting readings are listed side by side rather than averaged.

SourceConfidenceSWTWBalScrRA
LabExtreme Tennis X-Compareshape TearHigh16618.226.56585
ImageProduct image (silhouette inspection)shape Hybrid round/teardropHigh

Values are shown in each source's native scale (X-Compare, official or TWU). A blank cell means that source did not report that metric.

Closest alternatives

The rackets most similar to this one, using it as the reference.

  • NOX Cobalt Quantum 12K

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close100
  • Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 2026

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close100
  • Bullpadel XPLO Comfort

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close99
  • Head Coello Motion

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close99
  • Dunlop Galactica Pro LS

    Close on swingweight, balance and face stiffness, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close98
  • Tecnifibre Curva Power

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close98

Data & method

Measurements are third-party readings retained with provenance, and the score is a heuristic comparison, not an authoritative ranking. See the Method and Sources.