Head Extreme Pro Coello LTD

Photo: zonadepadel.com

Head Extreme Pro Coello LTD

Head · 2024 · Extreme

Teardrop

Head Extreme Pro Coello LTD pairs a moderate swingweight that balances stability with manoeuvrability and a teardrop head that splits the difference between power and control.

No price yet

Measurements

The headline figures used in the comparison, with where each sits across the indexed rackets.

Swingweight
181
Higher than 96% of rackets
Twistweight
20
Higher than 91% of rackets
Balance (cm)
27.2
Higher than 83% of rackets
Face stiffness
64
Higher than 53% of rackets
Frame stiffness
85
Higher than 22% of rackets
Foam & trampoline
Power Foam · Medium
Hybrid Woven (carbon+fiberglass)

Measurements by source

Every reading is kept with its source and confidence. Conflicting readings are listed side by side rather than averaged.

SourceConfidenceSWTWBalScrRA
LabExtreme Tennis X-CompareHigh1812027.26485
ImageProduct image (silhouette inspection)shape TeardropHigh

Values are shown in each source's native scale (X-Compare, official or TWU). A blank cell means that source did not report that metric.

Closest alternatives

The rackets most similar to this one, using it as the reference.

  • Head Coello Pro

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close100
  • Osaka Pro Tour LTD Power

    Close on balance, twistweight and face stiffness, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close93
  • Head Extreme Pro

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close89
  • Head Coello Pro

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight and the same head shape.

    Very close89
  • Bullpadel Ionic Power

    Close on swingweight, balance and twistweight, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close89
  • Head Speed Pro

    Close on balance, face stiffness and frame stiffness, the same head shape and similar foam.

    Very close88

Data & method

Measurements are third-party readings retained with provenance, and the score is a heuristic comparison, not an authoritative ranking. See the Method and Sources.