NOX EA10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtreme vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
vs99.5Very close
Measurements compared
| Metric | NOX | Oxdog |
|---|---|---|
| Swingweight | 168.3 | 168 |
| Balance (cm) | 26 | 26.5 |
| Twistweight | 18.8 | 19 |
| Face stiffness | 64 | 65 |
| Frame stiffness | 85 | 87 |
| Shape | Teardrop / diamond | Teardrop |
| Foam | MLD Black EVA | EVA Medium |
How they compare
- NOX EA10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtreme carries the higher swingweight, so it feels more solid and stable through the swing while the other is easier to manoeuvre.
- Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics has the higher twistweight, so it is the more forgiving on off-centre hits.
- Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics sits more head-heavy for added power; the other is more handle-friendly for control.
- Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics is the stiffer, more direct of the two.
Which to choose
Choose the NOX EA10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtreme for more stability and more control.
Choose the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics for a lighter, more manoeuvrable feel and more forgiveness.
Data & method
Full per-source measurements are on the pages for NOX EA10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtreme and Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics. The score is a heuristic comparison, not an authoritative ranking. See the Method.