Head Extreme Motion vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
vs100Very close
Measurements compared
| Metric | Head | Oxdog |
|---|---|---|
| Swingweight | 168 | 168 |
| Balance (cm) | 27 | 26.5 |
| Twistweight | 19 | 19 |
| Face stiffness | 66 | 65 |
| Frame stiffness | 89 | 87 |
| Shape | Teardrop | Teardrop |
| Foam | EVA Medium | EVA Medium |
How they compare
- Head Extreme Motion sits more head-heavy for added power; the other is more handle-friendly for control.
- Head Extreme Motion is the stiffer, more direct of the two.
Which to choose
Choose the Head Extreme Motion for more head-heavy power.
Choose the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics for more control.
Data & method
One or both rackets have conflicting measurements across sources, so treat the figures above as indicative.
Full per-source measurements are on the pages for Head Extreme Motion and Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics. The score is a heuristic comparison, not an authoritative ranking. See the Method.