Dunlop FX Pro vs Head Extreme Motion
Measurements compared
| Metric | Dunlop | Head |
|---|---|---|
| Swingweight | 168.5 | 168 |
| Balance (cm) | 26.9 | 27 |
| Twistweight | 20.1 | 19 |
| Face stiffness | 66 | 66 |
| Frame stiffness | 88 | 89 |
| Shape | Teardrop | Teardrop |
| Foam | EVA Medium | EVA Medium |
How they compare
- Dunlop FX Pro carries the higher swingweight, so it feels more solid and stable through the swing while the other is easier to manoeuvre.
- Dunlop FX Pro has the higher twistweight, so it is the more forgiving on off-centre hits.
- Head Extreme Motion sits more head-heavy for added power; the other is more handle-friendly for control.
- Head Extreme Motion is the stiffer, more direct of the two.
Which to choose
Choose the Dunlop FX Pro for more stability and more forgiveness.
Choose the Head Extreme Motion for a lighter, more manoeuvrable feel and more head-heavy power.
Data & method
One or both rackets have conflicting measurements across sources, so treat the figures above as indicative.
Full per-source measurements are on the pages for Dunlop FX Pro and Head Extreme Motion. The score is a heuristic comparison, not an authoritative ranking. See the Method.